Quote:
Originally Posted by killing karma
lmao somebody woke up on the wrong side of the bed. I never meant it to be "In" a keep, like other structural ncps that can be added it would be located on the outside. Not all guilds close their cities. My guild alone plans to make our city open to everyone and will leave the gate unlocked to make player city.
I'm not saying it's a bad idea for houses in any way. It just will have to be well thought out about. But this thread is not about house bankers, it's for keeps. Make another thread about it if you believe there should be ones added.
|
Then say what you mean. Don't be vague. Is that really so hard?
Not all guilds are close to their cities? Hrm, well, perhaps they should use the house spots around their keep in order to make it so. Not our fault. Want a city, build one.
The gate is not the keep. The keep is the actual building. Learn your terminology so you're not being 'vague' yet again. Notice you buy a 'keep deed' that doesn't make you the owner of the walls or the houses within those walls or even the gate that is owned by someone separate? It's just the single building. If you want to be really picky about your topics wording and staying on topic... houses are =AT= keep locations.
It will just have to be well thought out? You really don't think these things through... you mean it doesn't have to be well thought out for a keep, but it does for houses? Nicely done.
No the thread is not about house bankers, its about the banker at a keep, I said no and why. It just so happened to include houses in the reason why, which just so happen to be -at- keeps. Seem a bit upset by that.. like I ruined your pretty little shallow thought out idea. Don't like differing opinions, don't ask for opinions, period. Pretty simple.